You have no items in your shopping cart.
Ask us Live!
You have no items in your shopping cart.

During a recent parliamentary debate on the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband noted that the 17 countries of the Major Economies Forum accepted the long-held scientific consensus that work is needed to prevent a global temperature rise above 2 degrees.
However, it seems there is still some debate about global warming within parliament. Conservative backbencher Peter Lilley said that, without nuclear power, the Government’s ‘already overambitious’ targets would become pure fantasy. He believed that the models generating predictions of the effect of carbon on the environment were ‘deeply unreliable’.
Conservative MP John Gummer responded that if Mr Lilley’s analysis was right, it would still be a worthwhile task to address shortages of resources, and if he was wrong, he would lead the world to disaster. Therefore, he proposed that his views be ignored, “as I have had to do for the past 12 years”.
Rt Hon John Gummer MP
Rt Hon Peter Lilley MP
Source: Carbon Challenge

A plan to build a 6,000km-long wall across the Sahara Desert to stop the spread of the desert has been outlined.
The barrier – formed by solidifying sand dunes – would stretch from Mauritania in the west of Africa to Djibouti in the east.
The plan was put forward by architect Magnus Larsson at the TED Global conference in Oxford.
A 2007 UN study described desertification as “the greatest environmental challenge of our times”.
“The threat is desertification. My response is a sandstone wall made from solidified sand,” said Mr Larsson, who describes himself as a dune architect.
The sand would be stabilised by flooding it with bacteria that can set it like concrete in a matter of hours.
North African nations have promoted the idea of planting trees to form a Great Green Belt to prevent the spread of the sand.
A similar proposal – known as the Green Wall of China – has also been proposed to stop the spread of the Gobi Desert.
(more…)

Energy used in homes is responsible for over a quarter of all UK emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas causing climate change. Making your home as energy efficient as possible will reduce carbon emissions and could also save you over £300 a year on your fuel bills.
Most of the energy we use in our homes is produced using processes that release CO2 emissions into the air. CO2 emissions are the most significant cause of climate change, so reducing your home energy use is one of the most important things you can do to fight climate change. To find out how to save energy in the home please CLICK HERE.
‘Climate change’ refers to changes in the earth’s temperature over the last 100 years. Since 1900, the average temperature on the planet has increased by 0.74 degrees Celsius and the UK’s sea level has risen by about 10 centimetres. Further global rises are expected, as well as more extreme weather events like flooding and drought.
There is very strong evidence that people are changing the climate with actions which create emissions of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. In the UK, 40 per cent of these emissions are caused by individuals, mostly from energy used in the home, driving and air travel.
So what can we do? Some changes to the climate are inevitable, but there is still time to have a positive influence on the future. You can help minimise further changes and adapt to the new situation through decisions and actions which are often quick and easy to put into practice.
Here at The Energy Saving Company we aim to reduce your carbon footprint. Through our Home Energy Advisory & Technical report we can identify energy saving opportunities in your own home, by following advice provided by our qualified Domestic Energy Assessors you can make a difference from day one. To view our services please click here..